Changes Afoot – the Proposed Arbitration Fairness Act
The U.S. has been a staunch supporter of arbitration since 1925, when the U.S. Arbitration Act became law. The Arbitration Act makes arbitration agreements binding and simple to enforce, without significant exception. Rather suddenly, a substantial backlash against mandatory arbitration has appeared on the scene. One of the clearest indicators is the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act (H.R. 1020) that was introduced in the House of Representatives in February of 2009, and is still very much in play. While the anger is not directed at construction dispute arbitration, the concern is that commercial arbitration will end up being limited in important ways, as well as mandatory arbitration sc [...]
The Nuclear Option: legal consequences
As you will all have noticed, there is something of a nuclear renaissance underway. Among existing nuclear powered countries those leading the comeback are the US, China and India, all building, or with ambitious plans to build many more nuclear power plants. There is also substantial interest in nuclear power from countries that do not currently have nuclear power. Of these countries, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) can probably claim to be one of the furthest along the path of nuclear new build having recently announced the award of a contract to build four nuclear reactors to a South Korean consortium and with first power to the grid scheduled for 2017. So what does an aspiring nuclear [...]
Consultancy agreements and allegations of illegality
Contractors and suppliers operating abroad often conclude contracts with agents, consultants and other intermediaries who assist them in tender processes as well as in negotiating and performing contracts. Typically, these consultancy agreements provide that disputes are to be submitted to arbitration. Most disputes concern the consultants’ entitlement to a fee. In these disputes, the principal often argues that the contract was illegal under the applicable law. This notably occurred in two cases which led to two recent decisions of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court on applications to set aside or revise arbitral awards.
Getting into the Greenbacks: Hurdles in Competing for U.S. Government Construction Work
Non-U.S. companies frequently ask whether they are eligible to compete for U.S. Government construction and renovation projects, whether within the U.S. or on U.S.-owned facilities abroad. The answer is a simple “yes” in the great majority of cases, unless the project requires access to secure or classified information. Much of the work on U.S. Embassies, for example, requires such access (and some is restricted to only U.S. firms). To work on a secure/classified project, the contractor must possess an Industrial Facility Clearance (FCL), issued in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM). So let’s consider the requirements for that.
To b [...]
